|
Notes
from first all Community Meeting for Wilmington Local Waterfront
Revitalization Program (LWRP) The meeting was held to
collect community views on the waterfront and to introduce the LWRP process to
the community. Please see
previous minutes or contact Town Supervisor or project consultant for
background. A printout of the
PowerPoint presentation shown at the meeting is available at the Town
Clerk’s office. There
were approximately 70 people in attendance at the meeting, which began at Welcome Town Supervisor Citizens’ Committee
Members include: A list of partner
institutions was shown, including: nLocal
Partners q q q q nState
Partners qNYS
Department of State Division of Coastal Resources qWhiteface/ORDA qAdirondack
Park Agency qNYS
Department of Environmental Conservation Ashworth
also oriented the participants to the building, refreshments, and sign-up
sheets. Jeanne’s review included
the application process made by the Town of The consultants ( LWRP
Overveiw Andy LaBruzzo and What
is a Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP)? nA
program of the NYS Department of State Division of Coastal Resources nA
year to plan, then study problems and implement projects nPurpose
is to: qPreserve,
protect, develop and enhance waterfront resources qAchieve
a balance between economic development and preservation qEncourage
the development and use of coastal/ waterfront resources qExpand
access to the waterfront for recreational uses Parts of an LWRP? nPublic
Participation Plan nInventory
and Analysis nCommunity
Vision nProposed
Uses and Projects nImplementation
Strategy How
is the LWRP done? nCreates
a structure to implement existing Waterfront Initiatives nFuses
land use planning, economics, consensus building, design and environmental
sciences nCelebration
of the nPreservation-oriented,
building on local success and existing community plans nDetailed
implementation strategy What
are the Benefits to nImprove
public access to the nProtect
and restore natural and historic waterfront resources nIncrease
tourism opportunities n Benefits
to nCommunity
vision guides future development and work projects in boundary area nProtecting
community character / quality of life nComprehensive
land and water plan nA
tool to raise funds for projects and investments nPartnerships
with state and Federal agencies nNYSDOS
as an advocate for the plan and the community Visioning
X
What we like about the waterfront
/ what to keep o
Quiet, scenic vistas, birdwatching o
Paddling and fishing access in
many spots up and down stream o
Beach area (e.g. swimming and play
area for children, concerts, nature trail?) o
Not as commercial / busy as Lake
Placid or o
Restrictions on motor use on water
(currently 5 miles/hour within 100 feet of shore) X
What we’d like to change –
priority items o
Depth and channel width of lake
and river o
Improvements in beach area (e.g.
signage; bathroom and pavilion facilities; control of abuses such as vehicle
access to peninsula, drag racing, drinking, and vandalism; handicap access) o
Maintenance of environmental
integrity, if dredging is agreed to, for example o
Improvement of environmental
integrity, through reduction of salt, silt, and septic pollution, plus litter
control in public areas o
Enhanced local and visitor access
to, and understanding of, river (history, cultural use, natural information,
perhaps through fishing access maps, interpretive signs, riverwalk trail,
pollution advisories – e.g. “did you know - road runoff goes into our
river”) o No changes! X
What we could change if we had the
chance – thinking broadly o
Expanded sidewalks, foot access in
general (e.g. foot bridge over river), bike paths, and canoe trail o
Power lines over bridge and
elsewhere put underground to enhance views o
User-friendly aspects:
posted signs not friendly, maps for public access (especially fishing
and walking) needed / more widely available, docks/rafts, trail maps (informal
and formal) o
Aesthetic coordination to reflect o
Winter festival idea X
Thoughts about the LWRP process in
general / what we may need more information about o
Impacts of dredging, permitting
process, studies needed o
Sedimentation / source control
upstream and in Town (e.g. in zoning and building permits, storm water
management plan) o
Any downsides for o
Determining the boundary of the
waterfront o
Use of the Flume swimming hole
(safety, maintenance by DEC, liability) o
Need to balance maintenance of
current quiet atmosphere with improvements that might, besides benefiting
locals, attract more tourists o
Costs of changes (avoiding
overburdening local taxpayers) o
Good turnout at this meeting; good
to get people talking about issues; good opportunities so far to get
people’s input o
Results of survey so far: ·
46 respondents so far ·
What valued most about ·
Dredging needed if possible: Yes
(22), Undecided (10), No (4) ·
Silting a problem?
Should it be allowed to continue?:
Yes a problem (29), not a problem (8), Not continue (14), undecided (4) ·
Other issues:
Make beach attractive / maintained (11), Keep it same (10), Improve
kids’ area (4), Keep clean (3) ·
Year-round residents (41), bus.
owners (2) Next
Steps and Wrap-up Garrett Dague and nFeedback
on meeting and surveys will be publicized nWeb
site in development – ASCI will alert e-mail list when available.
nFocused
workshops February – March; please sign up to hear more nInventory
and analysis complete in April/May 2006;
findings to be shared at next meeting nNext
community meeting May/June nOngoing
grant applications nSurveys
– ongoing nPolicy
/ implementation work nSign
up for e-mail updates and / or volunteer to help For more information on the
Wilmington LWRP, please contact: |